Type a command or search the notes. Tab cycles completions. Up and down recall history when blank. Escape dismisses, then leaves the prompt.
MATH
[1251]

Polar form

The same complex number written with its modulus and argument.

This page describes a complex number by its distance from the origin and its direction, instead of by its Cartesian components. In these polar coordinates on the Argand plane, multiplication multiplies moduli and adds arguments, which makes powers and roots straightforward.

For z=x+iy≠0z=x+iy\ne0 with polar coordinates (r,θ)(r,\theta),

r=∣z∣,x=rcos⁡θ,y=rsin⁡θ.r=|z|,\qquad x=r\cos\theta,\qquad y=r\sin\theta.

Argument and polar form

[DEFINITION]

Complex number

A complex number is a number of the form

z=a+bi,a,b∈R,i2=−1.z=a+bi,\qquad a,b\in\mathbb R,\qquad i^2=-1.

The expression a+bia+bi is the Cartesian form of zz. Its real part is Re⁡(z)=a\operatorname{Re}(z)=a and its imaginary part is Im⁡(z)=b\operatorname{Im}(z)=b.

[DEFINITION]

Complex modulus

The modulus of z=a+biz=a+bi is

∣z∣=a2+b2.|z|=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}.
[DEFINITION]

Argument

For z≠0z\ne0, an argument of zz is a real number θ\theta satisfying

cos⁡θ=Re⁡(z)∣z∣,sin⁡θ=Im⁡(z)∣z∣.\cos\theta=\frac{\operatorname{Re}(z)}{|z|}, \qquad \sin\theta=\frac{\operatorname{Im}(z)}{|z|}.

Arguments are determined up to addition of 2πk2\pi k, where k∈Zk\in\mathbb Z. The principal argument Arg⁡(z)\operatorname{Arg}(z) is the unique argument in

−π<Arg⁡(z)≤π.-\pi<\operatorname{Arg}(z)\le\pi.

Choose the argument from the point's quadrant, not from tan⁡θ\tan\theta alone: tangent has period π\pi, so it cannot distinguish opposite quadrants.

The principal argument is one conventional choice; every argument remains valid. The number z=0z=0 has no argument, because the origin does not determine a direction.

[DEFINITION]

Polar form

For z≠0z\ne0, the polar form of zz is

z=r(cos⁡θ+isin⁡θ)=reiθ,r=∣z∣>0,z=r(\cos\theta+i\sin\theta)=re^{i\theta}, \qquad r=|z|>0,

where θ\theta is an argument of zz. The expressions a+bia+bi and reiθre^{i\theta} are two writings of the same complex number.

Euler's formula,

eiθ=cos⁡θ+isin⁡θ,e^{i\theta}=\cos\theta+i\sin\theta,

identifies the two expressions in the statement. Replacing θ\theta by θ+2πk\theta+2\pi k leaves zz unchanged.

Euler's formula is taken as given here rather than derived. The Taylor series of the exponential, sine and cosine are the usual route to a proof.

Multiplication by eiθe^{i\theta} rotates a point through angle θ\theta without changing its modulus; multiplication by reiθre^{i\theta} also scales it by rr. In coordinates, for z=x+iyz=x+iy,

(Re⁡(eiθz)Im⁡(eiθz))=(cos⁡θ−sin⁡θsin⁡θcos⁡θ)(xy)\begin{pmatrix} \operatorname{Re}(e^{i\theta}z)\\ \operatorname{Im}(e^{i\theta}z) \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\theta&-\sin\theta\\ \sin\theta&\cos\theta \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}x\\y\end{pmatrix}
[EXAMPLE]

Convert between the two forms

For z=1+iz=1+i,

∣z∣=12+12=2.|z|=\sqrt{1^2+1^2}=\sqrt2.

The point lies in the first quadrant and tan⁡θ=1\tan\theta=1, so θ=π/4\theta=\pi/4 is a principal argument. Hence

1+i=2 eiπ/4.1+i=\sqrt2\,e^{i\pi/4}.

Conversely,

2e−3πi/4=2(cos⁡(−3π4)+isin⁡(−3π4))=−2−2 i.\begin{aligned} 2e^{-3\pi i/4} &=2\left(\cos\left(-\frac{3\pi}{4}\right) +i\sin\left(-\frac{3\pi}{4}\right)\right)\\ &=-\sqrt2-\sqrt2\,i. \end{aligned}

[routine]

  1. [1]:Polar form
[THEOREM]

Modulus laws

For z,z1,z2∈Cz,z_1,z_2\in\mathbb C with z2≠0z_2\ne0,

zz‾=∣z∣2,∣z1z2∣=∣z1∣∣z2∣,∣z1z2∣=∣z1∣∣z2∣,z\overline z=|z|^2,\qquad |z_1z_2|=|z_1||z_2|,\qquad \left|\frac{z_1}{z_2}\right|=\frac{|z_1|}{|z_2|},∣Re⁡(z)∣≤∣z∣,∣Im⁡(z)∣≤∣z∣,∣z1+z2∣≤∣z1∣+∣z2∣,|\operatorname{Re}(z)|\le|z|, \qquad |\operatorname{Im}(z)|\le|z|, \qquad |z_1+z_2|\le|z_1|+|z_2|,∣z1−z2∣≥∣∣z1∣−∣z2∣∣,∣∑j=1Nzj∣≤∑j=1N∣zj∣(N≥1).|z_1-z_2|\ge\bigl||z_1|-|z_2|\bigr|, \qquad \left|\sum_{j=1}^N z_j\right| \le\sum_{j=1}^N|z_j|\quad(N\ge1).

The inequality for z1+z2z_1+z_2 is the triangle inequality in the Argand plane; the finite-sum version follows by applying it repeatedly. The reverse triangle inequality follows from

∣z1∣=∣(z1−z2)+z2∣≤∣z1−z2∣+∣z2∣|z_1|=|(z_1-z_2)+z_2|\le |z_1-z_2|+|z_2|

and the same argument with z1z_1 and z2z_2 interchanged.

Multiplication and division in polar form

[METHOD]

Multiply and divide in polar form

If z1=r1eiθ1z_1=r_1e^{i\theta_1} and z2=r2eiθ2z_2=r_2e^{i\theta_2}, then

z1z2=r1r2ei(θ1+θ2)z_1z_2=r_1r_2e^{i(\theta_1+\theta_2)}

and, for z2≠0z_2\ne0,

z1z2=r1r2ei(θ1−θ2).\frac{z_1}{z_2} =\frac{r_1}{r_2}e^{i(\theta_1-\theta_2)}.

In particular,

(reiθ)−1=1re−iθ.(re^{i\theta})^{-1}=\frac1r e^{-i\theta}.

Geometrically, a product multiplies the moduli and adds the arguments and a quotient divides the moduli and reverses the second rotation.

To see why the angles add, multiply (cos⁡θ1+isin⁡θ1)(cos⁡θ2+isin⁡θ2)(\cos\theta_1+i\sin\theta_1)(\cos\theta_2+i\sin\theta_2) and use the angle-addition identities: its real and imaginary parts become cos⁡(θ1+θ2)\cos(\theta_1+\theta_2) and sin⁡(θ1+θ2)\sin(\theta_1+\theta_2). The quotient rule then follows by multiplying by the inverse.

[EXAMPLE]

Perform product and quotient calculations

Let

z1=2 e3πi/2,z2=πe3πi/2.z_1=\sqrt2\,e^{3\pi i/2}, \qquad z_2=\pi e^{3\pi i/2}.

Both factors point down the imaginary axis. Their arguments add to 3π3\pi, so the product points along the negative real axis:

z1z2=π2 e3πi=−π2.z_1z_2=\pi\sqrt2\,e^{3\pi i}= -\pi\sqrt2.

If instead z2=πe3πi/4z_2=\pi e^{3\pi i/4}, then

z1z2=2πei(3π/2−3π/4)=2πe3πi/4.\frac{z_1}{z_2} =\frac{\sqrt2}{\pi}e^{i(3\pi/2-3\pi/4)} =\frac{\sqrt2}{\pi}e^{3\pi i/4}.
[PROPOSITION]

Principal arguments of products and quotients

For non-zero z1,z2∈Cz_1,z_2\in\mathbb C, there are integers k,ℓ∈Zk,\ell\in\mathbb Z such that

Arg⁡(z1z2)=Arg⁡(z1)+Arg⁡(z2)+2πk,\operatorname{Arg}(z_1z_2) =\operatorname{Arg}(z_1)+\operatorname{Arg}(z_2)+2\pi k,Arg⁡(z1z2)=Arg⁡(z1)−Arg⁡(z2)+2πℓ.\operatorname{Arg}\left(\frac{z_1}{z_2}\right) =\operatorname{Arg}(z_1)-\operatorname{Arg}(z_2)+2\pi\ell.

Adding or subtracting principal arguments gives an argument of the result, but it may lie outside the principal interval (−π,π](-\pi,\pi]. The integers kk and ℓ\ell record the reduction back into that interval. For instance, Arg⁡((−1)(−1))=0\operatorname{Arg}((-1)(-1))=0, whereas Arg⁡(−1)+Arg⁡(−1)=2π\operatorname{Arg}(-1)+\operatorname{Arg}(-1)=2\pi; the latter is an argument of the product, but not its principal argument.

Two polar forms describe the same non-zero number exactly when their moduli agree and their arguments differ by an integer multiple of 2π2\pi.

Powers through De Moivre's formula

[THEOREM]

De Moivre's formula

For θ∈R\theta\in\mathbb R and n∈Zn\in\mathbb Z,

(cos⁡θ+isin⁡θ)n=cos⁡(nθ)+isin⁡(nθ).\left(\cos\theta+i\sin\theta\right)^n =\cos(n\theta)+i\sin(n\theta).

More generally, if z=reiθz=re^{i\theta} with r>0r>0, then

zn=rneinθ.z^n=r^ne^{in\theta}.

For positive integers, use induction. The case n=1n=1 is immediate and if the formula holds at n=kn=k, multiplying by reiθre^{i\theta} gives

zk+1=rkeikθreiθ=rk+1ei(k+1)θ.z^{k+1}=r^ke^{ik\theta}re^{i\theta}=r^{k+1}e^{i(k+1)\theta}.

The zero case is z0=1z^0=1 and the negative-integer case follows from the multiplicative inverse. The condition r>0r>0 is essential for negative powers, because 00 has no multiplicative inverse.

[EXAMPLE]

Calculate a power

For z=2 e3πi/4z=\sqrt2\,e^{3\pi i/4},

z104=(2)104e104(3πi/4)=252e78πi=252.z^{104} =(\sqrt2)^{104}e^{104(3\pi i/4)} =2^{52}e^{78\pi i} =2^{52}.

Polar form handles the large exponent by treating the modulus and the argument separately.

[routine]

  1. [1]:De Moivre's formula

Roots of complex numbers

[DEFINITION]

An nth root of a complex number

For a complex number z0z_0 and a positive integer nn, an nnth root is a complex number zz satisfying

zn=z0.z^n=z_0.
[THEOREM]

Find the nth roots

If z0≠0z_0\ne0, nn is a positive integer and z0=r0eiθ0z_0=r_0e^{i\theta_0}, its distinct nnth roots are

zk=r0nexp⁡(iθ0+2πkn),k=0,1,…,n−1.z_k=\sqrt[n]{r_0}\exp\left(i\frac{\theta_0+2\pi k}{n}\right), \qquad k=0,1,\ldots,n-1.

They lie on a circle of radius r0n\sqrt[n]{r_0} centred at the origin and are equally spaced by an angle of 2π/n2\pi/n. A non-zero complex number has exactly nn distinct nnth roots.

To derive the formula, write z=ρeiϕz=\rho e^{i\phi}. If zn=z0z^n=z_0, equality of moduli gives ρn=r0\rho^n=r_0, while equality of arguments gives nϕ=θ0+2πkn\phi=\theta_0+2\pi k. Taking k=0,…,n−1k=0,\ldots,n-1 produces all distinct possibilities: two listed angles differ by less than 2π2\pi, so they cannot describe the same point. Replacing kk by k+nk+n adds 2π2\pi to the root's angle, so any other integer kk repeats one of them. If z0=0z_0=0, the only nnth root is z=0z=0.

[EXAMPLE]

Find the eighth roots of unity

Since 1=e2πik1=e^{2\pi i k} for every integer kk, the eighth roots of unity are

zk=e2πik/8,k=0,1,…,7.z_k=e^{2\pi ik/8},\qquad k=0,1,\ldots,7.

They are the eight equally spaced points on the unit circle. For example,

z0=1,z1=22+22i,z2=i,z_0=1,\qquad z_1=\frac{\sqrt2}{2}+\frac{\sqrt2}{2}i,\qquad z_2=i,

and the remaining roots continue around the circle.

[routine]

  1. [1]:Find the nth roots

The same polar multiplication gives the trigonometric identities in trigonometric and geometric applications. An nnth root solves zn=z0z^n=z_0; polynomial roots extend the question to zeros of general polynomials.

On this page